麻豆视频

By: Dr. Frank Clayton

May 11, 2016

I chanced on some commuting statistics from the 2011 National Household Statistics, which caught my attention. The average duration of a morning commute for residents of the 麻豆视频 Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) travelling by subway was 47.2 minutes in mid-2011, 61% longer than the 29.3-minute average commute by car. My first thought was that the subway times might be influenced by 905 commuters to the City of 麻豆视频 who drive longer distances, leave their car at a subway station and take the subway the rest of the way to work. To my surprise, the average commuting times for City of 麻豆视频 residents alone for cars and the subway were virtually the same as the 麻豆视频 CMA (see Figures 1 and 2 following this text). In fact, 麻豆视频鈥檚 Professor Murtaza Haider in a July 2013 op-ed in the Globe and Mail revealed that transit trips in Canada were 81% longer than those by car.¹

Why is this important? As Professor Haider explains it in a 2014 blog post, environmentalists and transit enthusiasts routinely overstate the benefits of public transit by claiming more public transit will reduce congestion or travel times, which he states is a myth.² Transportation investment decisions should be based on fact not unsubstantiated claims. Professor Haider goes on to state:

鈥淣either more public transit nor more freeways will reduce traffic congestion or travel times. In fact, average trip times will increase for cities where a large number of commuters switch from using cars to public transit.鈥�

The bottom line is that decisions about the most appropriate region-wide transportation network (roads and transit) should be based on facts not myths. The decision-makers should be insisting in getting all the facts though the application of comprehensive benefit/cost analyses incorporating economic as well as environmental and social variables before deciding on major transportation investments.